Difference between revisions of "Talk:SDK Contents"

From Winamp Developer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(give credit for unsigned comment)
(Who controls the SDK?: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Man this page says so little of any use. Why can I not find any decent SDK documentation anywhere? Some simple demos, step by step of what means what how it works etc. A leg up into the whole process as opposed to a plethora of header files and some uncommented undocumented solutions bundled up as an SDK. You're not making it easy, that's all I can say. {{unsigned|Validator}}
 
Man this page says so little of any use. Why can I not find any decent SDK documentation anywhere? Some simple demos, step by step of what means what how it works etc. A leg up into the whole process as opposed to a plethora of header files and some uncommented undocumented solutions bundled up as an SDK. You're not making it easy, that's all I can say. {{unsigned|Validator}}
 +
 +
== Who controls the SDK? ==
 +
 +
It [http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?postid=1621180 looks like] Nullsoft gives the community periodic drops of the SDK as they make new Winamp versions? Is there any other way to get it? I see there is a supposed [http://sourceforge.net/projects/cswinampsdk C# Winamp SDK]; has anyone tried anything with that? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 03:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:27, 10 June 2009

Man this page says so little of any use. Why can I not find any decent SDK documentation anywhere? Some simple demos, step by step of what means what how it works etc. A leg up into the whole process as opposed to a plethora of header files and some uncommented undocumented solutions bundled up as an SDK. You're not making it easy, that's all I can say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Validator (talkcontribs)

Who controls the SDK?

It looks like Nullsoft gives the community periodic drops of the SDK as they make new Winamp versions? Is there any other way to get it? I see there is a supposed C# Winamp SDK; has anyone tried anything with that? --Culix 03:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)