Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Winamp Developer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Codeblock formatting: new section)
(Proposal: move glossary: new section)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but is it possible to change the formatting of codeblocks that appear with the <nowiki><source></nowiki> tag? I see Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B#Language_features C++] article has neat dotted borders that appear around blocks of code, but using the same <nowiki><source lang="cpp"></nowiki> tag on this wiki doesn't seem to add that (it nicely still does the syntax highlighting, however). Is there a way to add those borders? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 02:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but is it possible to change the formatting of codeblocks that appear with the <nowiki><source></nowiki> tag? I see Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B#Language_features C++] article has neat dotted borders that appear around blocks of code, but using the same <nowiki><source lang="cpp"></nowiki> tag on this wiki doesn't seem to add that (it nicely still does the syntax highlighting, however). Is there a way to add those borders? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 02:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Proposal: move glossary ==
 +
 +
Since the glossary of terms is quite large, would anyone object to moving it on to its own page? Or is it preferable for some reason to keep it on the main page? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:22, 10 June 2009

Linkspam Notice

Do not post linkspam on this page — it will be removed on sight.


External Links

Codeblock formatting

Hey everyone,

Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but is it possible to change the formatting of codeblocks that appear with the <source> tag? I see Wikipedia's C++ article has neat dotted borders that appear around blocks of code, but using the same <source lang="cpp"> tag on this wiki doesn't seem to add that (it nicely still does the syntax highlighting, however). Is there a way to add those borders? --Culix 02:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposal: move glossary

Since the glossary of terms is quite large, would anyone object to moving it on to its own page? Or is it preferable for some reason to keep it on the main page? --Culix 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)