Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Winamp Developer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Proposal: move glossary: new section)
(Breadcrumb)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Linkspam Notice ==
 
== Linkspam Notice ==
 
'''Do not post linkspam on this page''' — it will be removed on sight.
 
'''Do not post linkspam on this page''' — it will be removed on sight.
----
 
== External Links ==
 
  
 
== Codeblock formatting ==
 
== Codeblock formatting ==
Line 13: Line 11:
  
 
Since the glossary of terms is quite large, would anyone object to moving it on to its own page? Or is it preferable for some reason to keep it on the main page? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 
Since the glossary of terms is quite large, would anyone object to moving it on to its own page? Or is it preferable for some reason to keep it on the main page? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Breadcrumb ==
 +
Would anyone be opposed to making the Breadcrumb at the top of the page a template? I am currently unable to save any page that uses the breadcrumb links because the word 'onl ine' in the link to 'On line Service Developer' triggers the wiki's spam filter :-/ e.g. I had to remove that link from the [[Articles]] page in order to save any changes. Perhaps a wiki admin could create a {{Breadcrumb}} template page which could be used at the top of the main pages? It might require some wiki coding to get the links right. Alternatively, could we relax that word out of the spam filter, since it's used in the breadcrumb? --[[User:Culix|Culix]] 14:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Culix|Culix]] 14:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:30, 10 June 2009

Linkspam Notice

Do not post linkspam on this page — it will be removed on sight.

Codeblock formatting

Hey everyone,

Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but is it possible to change the formatting of codeblocks that appear with the <source> tag? I see Wikipedia's C++ article has neat dotted borders that appear around blocks of code, but using the same <source lang="cpp"> tag on this wiki doesn't seem to add that (it nicely still does the syntax highlighting, however). Is there a way to add those borders? --Culix 02:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposal: move glossary

Since the glossary of terms is quite large, would anyone object to moving it on to its own page? Or is it preferable for some reason to keep it on the main page? --Culix 04:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Breadcrumb

Would anyone be opposed to making the Breadcrumb at the top of the page a template? I am currently unable to save any page that uses the breadcrumb links because the word 'onl ine' in the link to 'On line Service Developer' triggers the wiki's spam filter :-/ e.g. I had to remove that link from the Articles page in order to save any changes. Perhaps a wiki admin could create a Template:Breadcrumb template page which could be used at the top of the main pages? It might require some wiki coding to get the links right. Alternatively, could we relax that word out of the spam filter, since it's used in the breadcrumb? --Culix 14:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)--Culix 14:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)